Connect with us


Did Michigan know the play call made on the pick six thrown by Rutgers?

An NCAA investigation against the Wolverines involving sign stealing makes it fair to wonder.



Michigan defenders, from left, Derrick Moore, Michael Barrett and Josaiah Stewart rush against Rutgers quarterback Gavin Wimsatt during the second half of Michigan's 31-7 win on Saturday, Sept. 23 2023, in Ann Arbor.

On Thursday afternoon, it was reported that the NCAA notified Michigan football and the Big Ten conference of an open investigation involving alleged sign stealing by the Wolverines.

The part to understand is that stealing signs during the game is not actually illegal. That’s not what the NCAA is investigating.

From the report first issued by Ross Dellenger and Dan Wetzel of Yahoo Sports:

“The NCAA is investigating the Michigan football program for allegedly violating rules that prohibit teams from scouting, in person, future opponents, industry sources told Yahoo Sports.”

“The allegation pertains to NCAA Bylaw 11.6.1, which reads: “Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited,” sources say.”

Did Michigan send staffers to scout future opponents in person to identify signals for specific play calls? That’s what the NCAA wants answer to.

The Big Ten and Michigan head coach Jim Harbaugh issued statements stating full transparency and cooperation during the investigation.



What does this have to do with Rutgers?

After the news broke about the NCAA investigation, head coach Greg Schiano’s halftime interview during the Rutgers-Michigan game went viral on X.

At the time, his comments seemed a bit peculiar. It’s understandable that looking back on them, it’s fair to wonder if Schiano was in fact alluding to Michigan stealing signs. However, since the tweet of the interview was tweeted, Brian Fonseca reported that “Schiano’s comments were in relation to an officiating issue and not related to suspected sign stealing, a person with knowledge of the situation told NJ Advance Media.”

This makes sense because the context of the question was in regard to officiating. This was the same half that involved several questionable calls against Rutgers made by the officiating crew. That included a phantom holding call on Hollin Pierce on the second drive of the game with Rutgers leading Michigan 7-0 and near midfield after a 27 yard run by Kyle Monangai.

The idea that Schiano was referring to the referees in an ambiguous way makes sense in that he can be reprimanded and fined by the Big Ten for blatant complaints regarding officiating. This is what Schiano said after the game when asked about his halftime comments.

“Just the nuances of the game,” Schiano said. “I was frustrated with a few things. They’re a very good football team. You have to make sure you are on point with everything. Because if you’re not, it’s not just a gain, it’s a touchdown. If you’re not, it’s not just a (pass breakup), it’s a pick six. We had three shots inside the 30-yard line, and we get that against that team, it’s 14-7 at half. I think anybody who comes out here and plays the No. 2 team would sign up for that.”

Even if that is what Schiano was complaining about, that doesn’t mean that Michigan wasn’t potentially stealing signs.

Consider the game changing interception thrown by Gavin Wimsatt that resulted in a pick six returned by Mike Sainristil. It was his first interception of the season.

Many of us, including myself, criticized the play call made by offensive coordinator Kirk Ciarrocca in that situation. Calling a wide receiver screen pass into the middle of the field seemed both predictable and an unnecessary risk. However, part of that assessment was made by the fact that Michigan had two different defenders jump the pass.

In uploading the play to YouTube, this Michigan site MGoClip credited Michigan defensive coordinator Jesse Minter for having “two dudes converging on exactly this screen.”

You can watch the play below.

It’s possible the defenders just read the play in the moment or knew it was coming based on film review. Again, this play doesn’t serve as proof that Michigan did in fact steal signs and knew the screen was coming. However, it is a play that changed the game and one that Michigan wasn’t fooled in the slightest about defending.

There was no reason to question that Rutgers lost to Michigan in any other way but fair and square. Of course, Thursday’s report on an NCAA investigation into sign stealing makes it fair to now wonder…did Michigan steal signs from Rutgers and use it to their advantage against them in the game on September 23? I’m not denying that Michigan is the far more talented and the better team. That’s obvious. However, the NCAA is now looking into whether Rutgers was a victim of potential violations committed by Jim Harbaugh’s program. That’s hard to know at this time, but it’s now a real possibility.


Thanks for reading the The Scarlet Faithful. For more Rutgers Athletics content from The Scarlet Faithful, follow us on Twitter and Instagram. You can also subscribe to our YouTube ChannelYou can subscribe to The Scarlet Faithful podcast on AppleSpotify, Pocket Casts and anywhere else you listen to podcasts. For advertising inquiries or to reach out directly, email at

The Scarlet Faithful is a comprehensive site dedicated to covering Rutgers Athletics owned and operated by co-founder Aaron Breitman. He has been a fan of Rutgers sports since the 1980’s, is a 2000 graduate of Rutgers College and has covered Rutgers athletics since 2015. Aaron is a credentialed media member for the athletic department and a voting member for Big Ten basketball. The Scarlet Faithful provides original content with articles, podcasts and video analysis on a daily basis.



  1. BataliBoli98

    October 19, 2023 at 9:38 pm

    I’m not sure why this story has legs. Harbaugh denied it and therefore we should all just take his word. Ha! These guys will do ANYTHING to gain an advantage. Patriots, Astros, etc., etc. I’m not saying that MI is definitely guilty of this but there isn’t an objective sports fan out there who can be surprised by the allegations. We know that Harbaugh is a clown. Now, let’s see if he’s a cheater. Go RU!

  2. thevinman

    October 20, 2023 at 1:27 am

    Fuck Michigan!

  3. Henry Rutgers

    October 20, 2023 at 8:35 am

    Whether MU violated conference or NCAA rules will have no bearing on what we need to do to become bowl eligible and keep the momentum going into Indiana, Iowa and Maryland. By the time a ruling is made even if they did cheat, and the game is vacated or reversed bowl season will be long over.

    It is time to consider helmet modifications and send the play in without sideline signals. Of course, when playing MU we’d have to use military grade encrypted protocols for the transmission.

  4. pj43

    October 20, 2023 at 8:07 pm

    I’m gonna take the high road here and not impugn the character, integrity and class of a “Michigan Man” like li’l Jimmy Harbaugh. In the game THIS year, I note that I had the number 1 (one) as the over/under on how many times li’l Jimmy would go for a 2pt conversion if he had a late lead. Perhaps it’s his advancing age and/or a sign of maturity, but that li’l rascal never went for the 2pt conversion with the big lead. Atta boy, li’l Jimmy! The nuns at St. Francis of Assisi Catholic School where li’l Jimmy went to grammar school in Ann Arbor would be damn proud!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *